| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 19, 2008 1:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
| That manager could have gotten fired for doing that. Is the manager still around? Region 10 costs are half of what domestic resources are. That would have significantly increase their profitability percentage. Did you have that documented via email or anything? That calls for HR attention. That's fudging the numbers man. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
|
That manager could have gotten fired for doing that. Is the manager still around? Region 10 costs are half of what domestic resources are. That would have significantly increase their profitability percentage. Did you have that documented via email or anything? That calls for HR attention. That's fudging the numbers man.
|
Well check the NYC AERS projects, some moved hours and in some people were "asked" to sign off on the work papers that somebody else audited. I brought that up as you mentioned "ethical".
And contributing to the thread:
3. Service Type (audit, tax, FAS, consulting): ERS
5. Position: Consultant
6. Years with Deloitte:only a few months
8. Most recent rating: Did not have a chance to get a rating.
10. On the beach when let go? (y/n): Y
11. H1B (y/n)? Y
12. Thing that pisses you off most about this situation (or any other comments...):
They screwed up my H1 and had to leave the country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
During the Economic Downturn, Employers Must Remain Mindful of LCA and Other Obligations
During the present economic downturn, some employers may contemplate cost-cutting measures such as adjusting employee salaries, reducing work hours, retaining employees without pay, and similar actions. If these decisions will affect employees in H-1B, E-3 or H-1B1 nonimmigrant status, employers must consider their obligations under the labor condition application (LCA) in place for the positions these employees occupy.
Under Department of Labor (DOL) regulations, employers of H-1B, E-3 and Singaporean and Chilean H-1B1 nonimmigrants must apply for and obtain LCAs for the positions that such workers will fill. Under the terms and conditions of the LCA, the employer must, among other obligations, pay these employees no less than the required wage for the position offered. Actions that reduce an employee's wages so that his or her compensation falls to an amount below the required wage could be considered violations of the employer's LCA obligations or could create additional compliance responsibilities. These actions can include salary adjustments, reductions in work hours and placement of employees in nonproductive status or on leave without pay.
In addition, if an H-1B worker's employment is involuntarily terminated before his or her period of authorized admission expires, the employer must offer the employee the cost of return transportation to his or her last place of foreign residence. This obligation extends only to the principal H-1B employee; the employer is not required to offer transportation costs for dependents. Employers are not required to pay return transportation costs for E-3 employees. However, because labor and immigration regulations are unclear as to Singaporean and Chilean H-1B1 workers, it may be advisable to offer transportation costs to these employees in the event of an involuntary termination of employment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
| Anonymous wrote: |
1. Layoff Date: 10/14
2. Office:
3. Service Type (audit, tax, FAS, consulting): Consulting
4. Consulting line (S&O, HC, EA, TI):
5. Position: Consultant
6. Years with Deloitte: 1 and change
7. Severance (in weeks): 4 + 2 (consulting with lawyer before sign release) + PTO
8. Most recent rating: 4 (told I was an HR casualty - got dropped from 3 rating to 4 at HR meeting)
Due to low util (50%) last year because of project staffing issues:
a) held for 4 weeks before project was canceled;
b) budget got cut on another project after 2 weeks;
c) on another project forced to dump significant hours into generic codes that didn't count towards utilization
and despite all this and my 4 rating, my promotion date got moved up a year to 2009 - not sure how that makes any sense since since I wasn't supposed to know about the 3 rating
9. Current utilization: 118%
10. On the beach when let go? (y/n): nupe
11. H1B (y/n)? negative
12. Thing that pisses you off most about this situation (or any other comments...): as mentioned by other posters.......popularity and having someone fight for you - i guess i had neither
|
Hate to have the comments on this thread but I wanted to point out what you stated "c) on another project forced to dump significant hours into generic codes that didn't count towards utilization." If this is actually true, then what they are doing is wrong and unethical. If this had been a government project, they can loose their contract. This can be serious matter if it affects how we bill the client.
|
This is not unusual in our federal government jobs, especially the big ones. We're told to bill 9 hours a day (or whatever the contract specifies) even if we aren't productive for those hours. So we have people stretching 3-4 hours work tops into 9 hours, with repercussions from our manager and partner if we don't do it (and in my case the project partner is also the service lead so he controls all of the mid and end year promotion/salary processes). In federal it's all about billing clients for as much as we can take them for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Just spoke with a PeopleSoft, (Functional and Techncial positions) and Oracle EBS Recruiter - She works for Enterprise Solutions Group - A Professional Services Firm. They have projects all over the east coast.
The company web site is: www-e-s-g.com
If you want to reach out to her to chat about open positions or, send a resume - Here is her email address: dsulser@e-s-g.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Just spoke with a PeopleSoft, (Functional and Techncial positions) and Oracle EBS Recruiter - She works for Enterprise Solutions Group - A Professional Services Firm. They have projects all over the east coast.
The company web site is: www-e-s-g.com
If you want to reach out to her to chat about open positions or, send a resume - Here is her email address: dsulser@e-s-g.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
| Anonymous wrote: |
1. Layoff Date: 10/14
2. Office:
3. Service Type (audit, tax, FAS, consulting): Consulting
4. Consulting line (S&O, HC, EA, TI):
5. Position: Consultant
6. Years with Deloitte: 1 and change
7. Severance (in weeks): 4 + 2 (consulting with lawyer before sign release) + PTO
8. Most recent rating: 4 (told I was an HR casualty - got dropped from 3 rating to 4 at HR meeting)
Due to low util (50%) last year because of project staffing issues:
a) held for 4 weeks before project was canceled;
b) budget got cut on another project after 2 weeks;
c) on another project forced to dump significant hours into generic codes that didn't count towards utilization
and despite all this and my 4 rating, my promotion date got moved up a year to 2009 - not sure how that makes any sense since since I wasn't supposed to know about the 3 rating
9. Current utilization: 118%
10. On the beach when let go? (y/n): nupe
11. H1B (y/n)? negative
12. Thing that pisses you off most about this situation (or any other comments...): as mentioned by other posters.......popularity and having someone fight for you - i guess i had neither
|
Hate to have the comments on this thread but I wanted to point out what you stated "c) on another project forced to dump significant hours into generic codes that didn't count towards utilization." If this is actually true, then what they are doing is wrong and unethical. If this had been a government project, they can loose their contract. This can be serious matter if it affects how we bill the client.
|
unfortunately this kind of stuff goes on in the fed practice, on government projects, with partners approving it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Even the project partner approve it, it is still wrong. DT has a hotline to report these type of issues and there are retired partners on the other side of the hotline.
There was a project partner did that and then reported by the staff in that project, and he then got big trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
1. Layoff Date: 8/25
2. Office:NC
3. Service Type (audit, tax, FAS, consulting): ERS
4. Consulting line (S&O, HC, EA, TI):
5. Position: Consultant
6. Years with Deloitte: 20 months
7. Severance (in weeks): 4 + 2 (consulting with lawyer before sign release) + PTO
8. Most recent rating: 4 (originally 4, and pushed down to 4 by HR meeting
9. Current utilization: 60%
10. On the beach when let go? (y/n): N
11. H1B (y/n)? Y
12. Thing that pisses you off most about this situation (or any other comments...): HR and Partner kept preaching that there is no lay-off, and this happened a month after. They are all lairs in my opinion. As H1-b holder, they should have been more considerable for visa related situation. Also, HR had an admin call me on Friday at 4:45 to have me come into office on the following monday for the meeting that HR and Partner discuss lay-off; the weekend before this meeting was very unpleasant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
1. Layoff Date: 11/5
2. Office:National
3. Service Type (audit, tax, FAS, consulting): ERS
4. Consulting line (S&O, HC, EA, TI):
5. Position: Senior Consultant
6. Years with Deloitte: 1 year
7. Severance (in weeks): 4 + 4 (signed general release) + PTO
8. Most recent rating: 3
9. Current utilization: Very Busy
10. On the beach when let go? (y/n): N
11. H1B (y/n)? N
The thing that pisses me off: First it was layoffs in ERS in Fall 07 then Audit Spring 08 then I watched internal coaching group disappear, then watched yearly priorities move to monthly priorities. I knew it was only a matter of time before something happened. The even worse thing is I talked to another co-worker about being laid off and 1 hour later she was informed as well. Both of us without any warning.
At this point is Barry and his team going to "realign headcounts" every time plan is missed? These actions will damage the reputation of this firm for years to come. Both for us who leave and for those who remain. Personally it sucks to be let go, but I am glad not to be in an that environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Layoff Date: 2/20
2. Office: NE
3. Service Type (audit, tax, FAS, consulting): Consulting
4. Consulting line (S&O, HC, EA, TI):
5. Position: Manager
6. Years with Deloitte: 4
7. Severance (in weeks): 20 (consulting with lawyer before sign release) + PTO
8. Most recent rating: 4 (told I was an HR casualty - got dropped from 3 rating to 4 at HR meeting)
Due to low util (50%) last year because of project staffing issues:
a) Was out for a month from my wedding;
9. Current utilization: 104%
10. On the beach when let go? (y/n): Nope
11. H1B (y/n)? Yes
My counsellor was my biggest opponent. There were Partners and SMs fighting for me but my counsellor wanted me out of Deloitte. As I was on a project, I was able to negotiate my leaving date. I was proactive as I knew that I will be gone as soon as I rolled off. Thought it better to do it this way than be surprised. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
hey timbu,
dont spread wrong info that i wanted you out.. u think that others dont check this forum.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
ur layoff date says 2/20 is that true. have u applied for GC through D. what is going on . please spare the details  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
| GC has been applied thru D but not much is moving due to retrogression. Yes the date of leaving is 2/20 as I negotiated my release. I'm on a project which ends then so I was able to do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:05 am
|
|
|
|
|
| Timbu wrote: |
|
GC has been applied thru D but not much is moving due to retrogression. Yes the date of leaving is 2/20 as I negotiated my release. I'm on a project which ends then so I was able to do it.
|
This is the first instance i am seeing when the date has been negotiated.. awesome for you.. on the flip side.. i am thinking the next round of layoffs will happen in jan and feb and they are bunching you in to that cycle.
i hope they are not asking u to repay GC processing fees.
another question, do you think that u didnt meet the criteria for lay offs. i mean said that layoff is based on marketable skills, track record, future deployment blah blah ..etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB
Contact Us on Facebook!
This site is not affiliated with any company you may think it's affiliated with, and while we can't name the company we think you think it might be affiliated with, we're pretty sure you're thinking what we're thinking. The opinions expressed on greendotlife.com and associated forums, wikis and message boards reflect the opinions of the participants and not of greendotlife.com.
|